-
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING. On rehearing, appellant earnestly contends that a statute of a state providing for one landowner to compel his adjoining neighbor to contribute to the building of a fence on the 2. line between their lands for the exclusive benefit of another would be unconstitutional. That appellant has *Page 305 thereby presented no constitutional question, see, In rePetition of Pittsburgh, etc., R. Co. (1897),
147 Ind. 697 , 47 N.E. 151; Durham v. State, ex rel. (1892),133 Ind. 422 , 31 N.E. 787; Hobbs v. Gibson School Tp. (1924),195 Ind. 1 , 144 N.E. 527; Ewbank's Manual, (2d ed.) § 62a.Petition for rehearing denied.
Document Info
Docket Number: No. 12,212.
Citation Numbers: 149 N.E. 377, 84 Ind. App. 303
Judges: NICHOLS, C.J.
Filed Date: 11/5/1925
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 1/12/2023