-
Hill, C. J. 1. The exceptions taken to excerpts from the charge are supported by verbal inaccuracies, but there were no substantial or misleading errors; and the instructions, taken as a whole, fairly and clearly presented the issues.
2. There was conflict in the evidence, both as to the negligence alleged and the damages claimed. These conflicts were settled by the verdict; and as no error of law of a prejudicial character appears, no reason is shown for the grant of another trial. Judgment affirmed.
Document Info
Docket Number: 3516
Citation Numbers: 10 Ga. App. 349
Judges: Hill
Filed Date: 1/15/1912
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 1/12/2023