eLaws | Code of Federal Regulations | United States Code |
 All Courts
 State Courts
 Idaho Court of Appeals
 2019-02

State v. Luna ( 2019 )


Menu:
 
  •                IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO
Docket No. 46038
STATE OF IDAHO,                                 )
)   Filed: February 20, 2019
Plaintiff-Respondent,                    )
)   Karel A. Lehrman, Clerk
v.                                              )
)   THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED
GIOVANNI LUNA,                                  )   OPINION AND SHALL NOT
)   BE CITED AS AUTHORITY
Defendant-Appellant.                     )
)
Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada
County. Hon. Richard D. Greenwood, District Judge.
Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of fifteen years, with a minimum
period of confinement of five years, for aggravated battery, affirmed.
Eric D. Fredericksen, State Appellate Public Defender; Sally J. Cooley, Deputy
Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.
Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney
General, Boise, for respondent.
________________________________________________
Before GRATTON, Chief Judge; HUSKEY, Judge;
and BRAILSFORD, Judge
________________________________________________
PER CURIAM
Giovanni Luna pled guilty to aggravated battery. Idaho Code §§ 18-903(a), 18-907(a),
19-2520F. The district court sentenced Luna to a unified term of fifteen years with five years
determinate. Luna appeals asserting that the district court abused its discretion by imposing an
excessive sentence.
Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the
factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and
need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez,
    121 Idaho 114
    , 117-18,
    822 P.2d 1011
    , 1014-
15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez,
    106 Idaho 447
    , 449-51,
    680 P.2d 869
    , 871-73 (Ct. App.
1
1984); State v. Toohill,
    103 Idaho 565
    , 568,
    650 P.2d 707
    , 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing
the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver,
    144 Idaho 722
    , 726,
    170 P.3d 387
    , 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record
in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.
Therefore, Luna’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
2