State v. Chase Allen Lagers ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •                IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO
    Docket No. 43811
    STATE OF IDAHO,                                  )   2016 Unpublished Opinion No. 712
    )
    Plaintiff-Respondent,                     )   Filed: September 30, 2016
    )
    v.                                               )   Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk
    )
    CHASE ALLEN LAGERS,                              )   THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED
    )   OPINION AND SHALL NOT
    Defendant-Appellant.                      )   BE CITED AS AUTHORITY
    )
    Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada
    County. Hon. Deborah A. Bail, District Judge.
    Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of seven years, with a minimum
    period of confinement of two years, affirmed; order relinquishing jurisdiction,
    affirmed.
    Eric D. Fredericksen, Interim State Appellate Public Defender; Brian R. Dickson,
    Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.
    Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney
    General, Boise, for respondent.
    ________________________________________________
    Before MELANSON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge;
    and HUSKEY, Judge
    ________________________________________________
    PER CURIAM
    Chase Allen Lagers was found guilty of possession of a controlled substance. I.C. § 37-
    2732(c). The district court sentenced Lagers to a unified term of seven years, with a minimum
    period of confinement of two years. Lagers expressed some concern about the rider program and
    requested that the district court order execution of his sentence if the district court chose not to
    order probation. The district court determined that probation was not appropriate and retained
    jurisdiction. The district court later relinquished jurisdiction. Lagers appeals from his judgment
    1
    of conviction, asserting that his sentence is excessive1 and appeals from the order relinquishing
    jurisdiction, claiming that the district court erred by refusing to grant probation.
    Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the
    factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and
    need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 
    121 Idaho 114
    , 117-18, 
    822 P.2d 1011
    , 1014-
    15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 
    106 Idaho 447
    , 449-51, 
    680 P.2d 869
    , 871-73 (Ct. App.
    1984); State v. Toohill, 
    103 Idaho 565
    , 568, 
    650 P.2d 707
    , 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing
    the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 
    144 Idaho 722
    , 726, 
    170 P.3d 387
    , 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record
    in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.
    We note that the decision to place a defendant on probation or whether, instead, to
    relinquish jurisdiction over the defendant is a matter within the sound discretion of the district
    court and will not be overturned on appeal absent an abuse of that discretion. State v. Hood, 
    102 Idaho 711
    , 712, 
    639 P.2d 9
    , 10 (1981); State v. Lee, 
    117 Idaho 203
    , 205-06, 
    786 P.2d 594
    , 596-
    97 (Ct. App. 1990). The record in this case shows that the district court properly considered the
    information before it and determined that probation was not appropriate. Lagers argues that all
    of the relevant goals of sentencing could have been accomplished with probation. As noted
    above, however, the district court found that probation was not an appropriate course of action in
    Lagers’s case. The record does not indicate that the district court abused its discretion in
    relinquishing jurisdiction.
    Therefore, Lagers’s judgment of conviction and sentence and the district court’s order
    relinquishing jurisdiction are affirmed.
    1
    Lagers was also found guilty of and sentenced for misdemeanor possession of drug
    paraphernalia. However, he does not challenge this judgment of conviction or sentence on
    appeal.
    2