Morant v. Johnson , 79 F. App'x 600 ( 2003 )


Menu:
  •                                UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 03-7060
    JASON A. MORANT,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    GENE M. JOHNSON, Acting Director          of    the
    Virginia Department of Corrections,
    Respondent - Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District
    Judge. (CA-02-748-2)
    Submitted:    October 23, 2003               Decided:   October 30, 2003
    Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Jason A. Morant, Appellant Pro Se. John H. McLees, Jr., OFFICE OF
    THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).
    PER CURIAM:
    Jason A. Morant seeks to appeal the district court’s order
    adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and denying relief
    on his petition filed under 
    28 U.S.C. § 2254
     (2000).           An appeal may
    not be taken from the final order in a § 2254 proceeding unless a
    circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 
    28 U.S.C. § 2253
    (c)(1) (2000).       A certificate of appealability will
    not   issue   absent   “a   substantial   showing   of   the   denial   of   a
    constitutional right.”      
    28 U.S.C. § 2253
    (c)(2) (2000).       A prisoner
    satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists
    would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that
    any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also
    debatable or wrong.     See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 
    537 U.S. 322
    ,             ,
    
    123 S. Ct. 1029
    , 1040 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 
    529 U.S. 473
    , 484
    (2000); Rose v. Lee, 
    252 F.3d 676
    , 683 (4th Cir. 2001).             We have
    independently reviewed the record and conclude that Morant has not
    made the requisite showing.      Accordingly, we deny a certificate of
    appealability and dismiss the appeal.           We dispense with oral
    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 03-7060

Citation Numbers: 79 F. App'x 600

Judges: Motz, Per Curiam, Shedd, Williams

Filed Date: 10/30/2003

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/6/2023