in Re: Bret David Foreman ( 2015 )


Menu:
  • Deny and Opinion Filed November 23, 2015
    S   In The
    Court of Appeals
    Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
    No. 05-15-01376-CV
    IN RE BRET DAVID FOREMAN
    On Appeal from the 429th Judicial District Court
    Collin County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause No. 429-51023-2014
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Before Justices Francis, Myers, and Schenck
    Opinion by Justice Francis
    Relator Bret David Foreman is confined in the Collin County jail on the trial court’s
    order holding him in criminal and civil contempt for failing to pay court-ordered child support
    and medical support. Relator filed this petition for writ of habeas corpus claiming the underlying
    commitment order is void and his due process rights are being violated.           He seeks to be
    discharged from confinement.
    A court may punish for contempt. TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 21.002 (West 2004). A
    habeas corpus proceeding is a collateral attack on a judgment of contempt. In re Johnson, 
    337 S.W.3d 486
    , 488 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2011, orig. proceeding). Relator has the burden to show
    the contempt order is void, not merely voidable, and must conclusively show his entitlement to
    the writ. 
    Id. A contempt
    order is void if it is beyond the power of the court to render it or if it
    deprives the relator of liberty without due process of law. Ex parte Burnett, 
    600 S.W.2d 252
    ,
    254 (Tex. 1980) (orig. proceeding).
    We have carefully reviewed the record in this case as well as the issues presented. As to
    the criminal contempt portion of the order, we conclude relator has failed to show the court was
    without jurisdiction to render the contempt order or that his due process rights are being violated.
    As for civil contempt, Foreman must first fully serve the criminal portion of his sentence before
    he may challenge the civil contempt order. See In re Spradley, 05-05-01068-CV, 
    2005 WL 1950976
    , at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas Aug. 16, 2005, orig. proceeding). Relator may file a new
    petition for writ of habeas corpus if, after he has served his sentence for criminal contempt, he
    remains confined on the civil contempt order. 
    Id. We deny
    relator’s petition for writ of habeas corpus.
    151376F.P05
    /Molly Francis/
    MOLLY FRANCIS
    JUSTICE
    –2–
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 05-15-01376-CV

Filed Date: 11/23/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/27/2015