United States v. Marleni Arana-Chavarria , 591 F. App'x 563 ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                              NOT FOR PUBLICATION                         FILED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                       JAN 28 2015
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                        No. 14-50171
    Plaintiff - Appellee,               D.C. No. 3:13-cr-03587-DMS
    v.
    MEMORANDUM*
    MARLENI DEL CARMEN
    ARANA-CHAVARRIA,
    Defendant - Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of California
    Dana M. Sabraw, District Judge, Presiding
    Submitted January 21, 2015**
    Before:       CANBY, GOULD, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
    Marleni Del Carmen Arana-Chavarria appeals from the district court’s
    judgment and challenges the 60-month sentence imposed following her guilty-plea
    conviction for importation of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
    **
    The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
    without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    and 960. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
    Arana-Chavarria contends that the district court erred by failing to compare
    her culpability to that of other participants in the drug smuggling organization when
    it denied her a minor role adjustment under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2(b). We review de
    novo the district court's interpretation of the guidelines and for clear error the district
    court’s factual determination that a defendant is not a minor participant. See United
    States v. Hurtado, 
    760 F.3d 1065
    , 1068 (9th Cir. 2014). Contrary to
    Arana-Chavarria’s contention, the record reflects that the court properly considered
    Arana-Chavarria’s culpability relative to that of the average participant. See
    U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2 cmt. n.3(A). Further, in light of the totality of the circumstances,
    the district court did not clearly err in determining that Arana-Chavarria failed to
    prove that she was entitled to the adjustment. See 
    id. § 3B1.2
    cmt. n.3(C); 
    Hurtado, 760 F.3d at 1069
    .
    AFFIRMED.
    2                                      14-50171
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 14-50171

Citation Numbers: 591 F. App'x 563

Filed Date: 1/28/2015

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 1/13/2023