United States v. J. Ramirez-Castillo ( 1997 )


Menu:
  •                        United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    _____________
    No. 96-4075MN
    _____________
    United States of America,               *
    *
    Appellee,             *
    *
    v.                                *
    *
    Jesus Ramirez-Castillo, also known as   *
    Hector Vinicio Arias, also known as     *
    Jesus Ramirez, also known as Jesus      *
    Cortez, also known as Pedro Meyer,      *
    also known as Jose Luis Cortes,         *
    *
    Appellant.            *
    Appeals from the United States
    _____________                   District Court for the District
    of Minnesota.
    No. 97-1352MN
    _____________                        [UNPUBLISHED]
    United States of America,               *
    *
    Appellee,            *
    *
    v.                               *
    *
    Izaida Villaneuva-Ramirez, also known *
    as Izaida Cortez-Villaneuva, Izaida     *
    Cortez, Izaida Ramirez, Izaida Ramirez- *
    Cortez, Charol Matos,                   *
    *
    Appellant.           *
    _____________
    Submitted: October 21, 1997
    Filed: October 30, 1997
    _____________
    Before FAGG, WOLLMAN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.
    _____________
    PER CURIAM.
    Jesus Ramirez-Castillo and Izaida Villaneuva-Ramirez appeal their drug-related
    convictions. Ramirez-Castillo and Villaneuva-Ramirez contend the evidence was
    insufficient to establish that Ramirez-Castillo carried a firearm during and in relation
    to a drug-trafficking crime in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c). Ramirez-Castillo also
    raises a plain error contention that the district court improperly admitted evidence that
    Ramirez-Castillo shot an intruder during a drug-related robbery. Additionally,
    Villaneuva-Ramirez raises contentions related to the admissibility of evidence of
    uncharged drug dealing offered by the government, the sufficiency of the evidence, and
    the district court's plain error instruction about the section 924(c) firearm count. A
    review of the record shows the parties' claims are without merit. Because the appeal
    involves the straightforward application of settled principles of law, a discussion of the
    issues will serve no useful purpose. We thus affirm the convictions of Ramirez-Castillo
    and Villaneuva-Ramirez without an extended opinion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
    A true copy.
    Attest:
    CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 96-4075

Filed Date: 10/30/1997

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/13/2015