Hale v. Hall , 22 F. App'x 82 ( 2001 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-1412
EARNEST C. HALE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
SARAH HALL; SID BELL, Prosecuting Attorney,
McDowell County, Welch, West Virginia; CHARLIE
SMITH; BILL SADLER; TODD HOUCK; KEVIN WADE;
TRACY, LUSK, & ASSOCIATES, Involved; STATE OF
WEST VIRGINIA,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Charles H. Haden II, Chief
District Judge. (CA-01-33-5)
Submitted: September 20, 2001 Decided: September 25, 2001
Before LUTTIG, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Earnest C. Hale, Appellant Pro Se. Ancil Glenn Ramey, STEPTOE &
JOHNSON, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Earnest C. Hale appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting
the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
Hale v. Hall, No. CA-01-33-5 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 7, 2001). We dis-
pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2