Suazo-Umanzor v. Gonzales , 127 F. App'x 131 ( 2005 )


Menu:
  •                                                         United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    F I L E D
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                  March 24, 2005
    Charles R. Fulbruge III
    Clerk
    No. 04-60199
    Summary Calendar
    JUAN ALBERTO SUAZO-UMANZOR,
    Petitioner,
    versus
    ALBERTO R. GONZALES, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,
    Respondent.
    --------------------
    Petition for Review of an Order of the
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    BIA No. A78 325 120
    --------------------
    Before REAVLEY, JOLLY and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Juan Alberto Suazo-Umanzor, a citizen of El Salvador,
    petitions this court to review the decision of the Board of
    Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying his application for asylum,
    withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention
    Against Torture (“CAT”).   Suazo-Umanzor asserts that his “life
    was threatened and because the government of El Salvador appears
    to be unable or unwilling to control the gangs in said country”
    he is entitled to a grant of asylum.
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
    this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
    under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    No. 04-60199
    -2-
    Suazo-Umanzor, who is represented by counsel, does not
    challenge the immigration judge’s (“IJ’s”) finding that his claim
    does not fall within one of the five grounds enumerated in the
    Immigration and Nationality Act to establish eligibility for
    asylum.    Further, he does not challenge the IJ’s finding that he
    failed to establish that he could not relocate to another part of
    El Salvador to avoid the problems with the gang.    Finally, Suazo-
    Umanzor does not argue that there was error in the denial of his
    application for withholding of removal or protection under the
    CAT.    As such, Suazo-Umanzor has abandoned all of his claims on
    appeal.    See Calderon-Ontiveros v. I.N.S., 
    809 F.2d 1050
    , 1052
    (5th Cir. 1986).    Accordingly, Suazo-Umanzor petition for review
    of the BIA’s decision is DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS.    See 5TH CIR.
    R. 42.2.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-60199

Citation Numbers: 127 F. App'x 131

Judges: Higginbotham, Jolly, Per Curiam, Reavley

Filed Date: 3/24/2005

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/2/2023