Blondell Mitchell v. Media Com , 511 F. App'x 595 ( 2013 )


Menu:
  •                United States Court of Appeals
    For the Eighth Circuit
    ___________________________
    No. 12-3717
    ___________________________
    Blondell Mitchell
    lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
    v.
    Media Com; Rick Sanchez; Cable News Network; Time Warner, Inc.; CNN Board
    of Directors; Time Warner Board of Directors
    lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees
    ____________
    Appeal from United States District Court
    for the Southern District of Iowa - Des Moines
    ____________
    Submitted: May 28, 2013
    Filed: July 1, 2013
    [Unpublished]
    ____________
    Before BYE, ARNOLD, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
    ____________
    PER CURIAM.
    Blondell Mitchell appeals the district court’s1 order dismissing her action for
    lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and denying her motions to amend her complaint
    and for default judgment. After careful consideration, see A.J. v. UNUM, 
    696 F.3d 788
    , 789 (8th Cir. 2012) (per curiam) (de novo review of Federal Rule of Civil
    Procedure 12(b)(1) dismissals), we conclude dismissal was proper, given that the
    parties are not completely diverse and Mitchell failed to present a federal question, see
    
    28 U.S.C. § 1331
     (federal courts have jurisdiction over civil actions presenting federal
    question); OnePoint Solutions, LLC v. Borchert, 
    486 F.3d 342
    , 346 (8th Cir. 2007)
    (diversity jurisdiction under 
    28 U.S.C. § 1332
    (a) requires complete diversity among
    litigants); see also Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 
    556 U.S. 662
    , 678 (2009) (complaint must state
    “more than an unadorned, the-defendant-unlawfully-harmed-me accusation”;
    conclusory statements of law are insufficient to support claim). Because her proposed
    complaint amendments were futile, we conclude the district court did not abuse its
    discretion by denying her motion to amend, see Cont’l Holdings, Inc. v. Crown
    Holdings Inc., 
    672 F.3d 567
    , 574 (8th Cir. 2012) (standard of review); and because
    the court lacked jurisdiction, we conclude it did not abuse its discretion by denying
    her motion for default judgment, see Weitz Co. v. MacKenzie House, LLC, 
    665 F.3d 970
    , 977 (8th Cir. 2012) (standard of review).
    Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
    ______________________________
    1
    The Honorable Ronald E. Longstaff, United States District Judge for the
    Southern District of Iowa, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable
    Thomas J. Shields, United States Magistrate Judge for the Southern District of Iowa.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 12-3717

Citation Numbers: 511 F. App'x 595

Judges: Arnold, Bye, Per Curiam, Shepherd

Filed Date: 7/1/2013

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/6/2023