robert-gene-cunningham-individually-and-as-representative-of-the-estate-of ( 2008 )


Menu:
  •  

     

     

     

     

     

                                            COURT OF APPEALS

                                             SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                                         FORT WORTH

     

                                               NO. 2-07-231-CV

     

    NOBLE EZUKANMA, M.D. AND                                            APPELLANTS

    HEALTHFIRST MEDICAL GROUP,

    P.A., AND KRISHNABABU

    CHUNDURI, M.D.

     

                                                          V.

     

    ROBERT GENE CUNNINGHAM,                                               APPELLEES

    INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE

    OF THE ESTATE OF PATRICIA MAUDINE

    CUNNINGHAM, DECEASED, ROBIN LEE

    CUNNINGHAM BISHOP, AND TRACY

    JEANNE CUNNINGHAM LANG

     

                                                        AND

     

    ROBERT GENE CUNNINGHAM,                                            APPELLANTS

    INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE

    OF THE ESTATE OF PATRICIA MAUDINE

    CUNNINGHAM, DECEASED, ROBIN LEE

    CUNNINGHAM BISHOP, AND TRACY JEANNE

    CUNNINGHAM LANG

     

                                                          V.

     

    LADI O.M. HAROONA, M.D.                                                     APPELLEE

     

                                                       ----------

                  FROM THE 141ST DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

                                                       ----------


                       MEMORANDUM OPINION[1] AND JUDGMENT

                                                       ----------

    We have considered appellants Noble Ezukanma, M.D. and HealthFirst Medical Group, P.A. and appellees Robert Gene Cunningham, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Patricia Maudine Cunningham, Deceased, Robin Lee Cunningham Bishop, and Tracy Jeanne Cunningham Lang=s AJoint Motion To Dismiss.@ It is the court=s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss appellants= appeal of the final judgment entered in appellees= favor only.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2), 43.2(f).

    Costs of appellants= appeal of the judgment entered in appellees= favor shall be paid by the party incurring the same, for which let execution issue.

     

    PER CURIAM

     

     

    PANEL: GARDNER, DAUPHINOT, and HOLMAN, JJ.

     

    DELIVERED: December 11, 2008



    [1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

Document Info

Docket Number: 02-07-00231-CV

Filed Date: 12/11/2008

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/1/2016