Melcher v. Hill , 194 Pa. 440 ( 1900 )

Per Curiam,

An examination of the testimony in this case fails to convince us that there was any sufficient reason for introducing the alleged parol stipulations into the written agreement as a part thereof, and we therefore sustain the action of the learned court below in refusing to open the judgment.

The order of the court below is affirmed and appeal dismissed at the cost of the appellants.