United States v. Beach ( 2005 )


Menu:
  •                                UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 05-4431
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    EDWARD JOHN BEACH,
    Defendant - Appellant.
    No. 05-4432
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    EDWARD JOHN BEACH,
    Defendant - Appellant.
    Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Richard L. Voorhees,
    District Judge. (CR-02-260-V)
    Submitted:   August 18, 2005                 Decided:   August 23, 2005
    Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Aaron Edmund Michel, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant.
    Gretchen C. F. Shappert, Interim United States Attorney, Kimlani S.
    Murray, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North
    Carolina, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).
    - 2 -
    PER CURIAM:
    In these consolidated appeals, Edward John Beach seeks to
    appeal the district court’s orders denying his motion to dismiss
    his   trial    counsel   and   adopting     the   magistrate    judge’s
    recommendation and denying his motion to suppress evidence at his
    criminal trial. Although Beach was found guilty after a jury trial
    of various drug crimes, he has not yet been sentenced.     This court
    may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 
    28 U.S.C. § 1291
    (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 
    28 U.S.C. § 1292
     (2000).   The orders Beach seeks to appeal are neither final
    orders   nor   appealable   interlocutory    or   collateral    orders.
    Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals for lack of jurisdiction.        We
    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal materials
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    - 3 -
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 05-4431

Filed Date: 8/23/2005

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014