Guihua Gu v. Eric Holder, Jr. , 535 F. App'x 568 ( 2013 )


Menu:
  •                                                                            FILED
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION                            JUL 31 2013
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                      U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    GUIHUA GU,                                       No. 11-72220
    Petitioner,                       Agency No. A088-483-488
    v.
    MEMORANDUM *
    ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
    Respondent.
    On Petition for Review of an Order of the
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Submitted July 24, 2013 **
    Before:        ALARCÓN, CLIFTON, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
    Guihua Gu, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board
    of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s
    decision denying his application for asylum and withholding of removal. We have
    jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
    **
    The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
    without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    agency’s factual findings, applying the standards governing adverse credibility
    determinations created by the Real ID Act. Shrestha v. Holder, 
    590 F.3d 1034
    ,
    1039 (9th Cir. 2010). We deny the petition for review.
    The agency concluded Gu was not credible for a number of reasons,
    including the implausibility that Gu - whose claim rested on his purported
    confrontations with government officials over compensation for demolished
    properties - would not bother to inquire whether the government had ultimately
    compensated landowners, his general testimony that lacked detail, and the
    inconsistencies and implausibilities related to his employment. Substantial
    evidence supports the agency’s finding. See id. at 1048 (adverse credibility finding
    reasonable under totality of the circumstances). We reject Gu’s contention that the
    agency did not give his documentary evidence adequate weight. Accordingly,
    Gu’s asylum and withholding of removal claims fail. See Farah v. Ashcroft, 
    348 F.3d 1153
    , 1156 (9th Cir. 2003).
    PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
    2                                    11-72220
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 11-72220

Citation Numbers: 535 F. App'x 568

Judges: Alarcon, Callahan, Clifton

Filed Date: 7/31/2013

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/7/2023