Earl v. Gould ( 2006 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-6782
VINCENT BRADFORD EARL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
LIEUTENANT GOULD,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, Senior
District Judge. (1:03-cv-00109)
Submitted: July 20, 2006 Decided: July 28, 2006
Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Vincent Bradford Earl, Appellant Pro Se. Julie M. Kepple, BUNCOMBE
COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, Asheville, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Vincent Bradford Earl appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his claims filed pursuant to the Religious Land
Use and Institutionalized Persons Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000cc -
2000cc-5 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. Earl v. Gould, No. 1:03-cv-00109 (W.D.N.C.
Apr. 11, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -