Kimball v. State , 84 Tex. Crim. 161 ( 1918 )

Upon his plea of guilty appellant was convicted of the theft of an automobile of the value of $400.

There is no statement of facts or bill of exceptions. The charge and judgment of the court distinctly show that the appellant was properly admonished of the consequences of a plea of guilty by the court before the court would receive it. (Art. 565, C.C.P.) Appellant merely filed a motion for a new trial, alleging that the judgment and verdict were contrary to the law and the evidence, hence there is nothing to review.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.