Diane Williams v. Huntington Bancshares, Inc. , 220 F. App'x 957 ( 2007 )

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FILED
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
MAR 22, 2007
No. 06-13489 THOMAS K. KAHN
Non-Argument Calendar CLERK
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 04-02298-CV-T-30-EAJ
DIANE WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
HUNTINGTON BANCSHARES, INC.,
an Ohio corporation,
d.b.a. Huntington National Bank,
Defendant-Appellee.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
_________________________
(March 22, 2007)
Before BLACK, WILSON and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Diane Williams, a black female proceeding pro se, appeals the district
court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of her employer, Huntington National
Bank on her claims of race discrimination brought pursuant to the Civil Rights Act
of 1964 (Title VII), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a), 42 U.S.C. § 1981, and the Florida
Civil Rights Act, Fla. Stat. § 760.10. Williams asserts the Bank discriminated
against her on the basis of her race because it “demoted” her from a part-time
Personal Banker position to a part-time Teller position at the Central Plaza branch.1
After a de novo review, we affirm for the reasons stated in the district court’s well-
reasoned order of May 22, 2006.
AFFIRMED.
1
Williams also makes reference to retaliation, and gender and age discrimination. The
complaint alleged only racial discrimination, thus, because Williams’ complaint presented one
particular claim and was adjudicated on the basis of that claim, consideration of these other issues
is inappropriate. See Narey v. Dean, 32 F.3d 1521, 1526 (11th Cir. 1994) (stating issues not argued
in the district court are generally not considered on appeal).
2