keith-luker-v-bank-of-america-na-as-successor-by-merger-to-lasalle-bank ( 2011 )


Menu:
  • COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-11-00318-CV KEITH LUKER APPELLANT V. BANK OF AMERICA, NA AS APPELLEE SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO LASALLE BANK, NA, TRUSTEE FOR CERTIFICATE HOLDERS OF BEAR STEARNS ASSET BACK SECURITIES I LLC, ASSET BACKED CERTIFICATES SERIES 2007-FSI ------------ FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY ------------ MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT ------------ On August 23, 2011, and September 12, 2011, we notified appellant, in accordance with rule of appellate procedure 42.3(c), that we would dismiss this 1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. appeal unless the $175 filing fee was paid. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c). Appellant has not paid the $175 filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 12.1(b). Because appellant has failed to comply with a requirement of the rules of appellate procedure and the Texas Supreme Court’s order of August 28, 2007, 2 we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f). Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4. PER CURIAM PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and GARDNER, JJ. DELIVERED: October 13, 2011 2 See Supreme Court of Tex., Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 07-9138 (Aug. 28, 2007) (listing fees in courts of appeals). 2

Document Info

Docket Number: 02-11-00318-CV

Filed Date: 10/13/2011

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/1/2016