United States v. George Rock , 710 F. App'x 713 ( 2018 )


Menu:
  •                  United States Court of Appeals
    For the Eighth Circuit
    ___________________________
    No. 17-2310
    ___________________________
    United States of America
    lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee
    v.
    George H. Rock
    lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant
    ____________
    Appeal from United States District Court
    for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City
    ____________
    Submitted: February 6, 2018
    Filed: February 8, 2018
    [Unpublished]
    ____________
    Before GRUENDER, BOWMAN, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
    ____________
    PER CURIAM.
    George Rock appeals the above-guidelines sentence the district court1 imposed
    after he pleaded guilty to a felon-in-possession offense. His counsel has moved for
    1
    The Honorable Greg Kays, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the
    Western District of Missouri.
    leave to withdraw and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
    (1967), presenting as an issue whether Rock’s sentence is unreasonable.
    Upon careful review, we conclude that Rock’s sentence is not unreasonable.
    See United States v. Feemster, 
    572 F.3d 455
    , 461 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc)
    (reviewing sentence under deferential abuse-of-discretion standard); United States v.
    Mangum, 
    625 F.3d 466
    , 469-70 (8th Cir. 2010) (holding that upward variance was
    reasonable where court made individualized assessment of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)
    factors based on facts presented and considered defendant’s proffered information).
    In addition, having independently reviewed the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio,
    
    488 U.S. 75
    (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. “We remind counsel,
    however, of their obligation in filing an Anders brief. Such a brief must be done as
    an advocate for the appellant, not the government, and should refer to anything in the
    record that might arguably support the appeal.” See United States v. Frazier, 
    133 F.3d 923
    , 923 (8th Cir. 1997) (per curiam) (citing Evans v. Clarke, 
    868 F.2d 267
    , 268
    (8th Cir. 1989)).
    Accordingly, we grant counsel leave to withdraw, and we affirm.
    ______________________________
    -2-