in Re: Jeremie Glen Tennison ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •                                          NO. 12-16-00270-CR
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
    TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT
    TYLER, TEXAS
    IN RE:                                                    §
    JEREMIE GLEN TENNISON,                                    §   ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
    RELATOR                                                   §
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    PER CURIAM
    Relator Jeremie Glen Tennison is charged with evading arrest. He waived his right to a
    jury trial, and the case is set for a bench trial on September 28, 2016. On August 23, 2016,
    Relator filed a motion to withdraw his waiver of jury trial and requested a pretrial hearing on the
    motion. According to Relator, the court coordinator notified his attorney that the matter would
    be considered on the day of trial. Relator seeks mandamus relief from the trial court’s refusal to
    hold a pretrial hearing before September 28, 2016. He also requested an emergency stay of the
    bench trial, which we denied.
    After considering Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus, the Court is of the opinion that
    he has not shown he is entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, Relator’s petition for writ of
    mandamus is denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a), (d).
    Opinion delivered September 30, 2016.
    Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.
    (DO NOT PUBLISH)
    COURT OF APPEALS
    TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    JUDGMENT
    SEPTEMBER 30, 2016
    NO. 12-16-00270-CR
    JEREMIE GLEN TENNISON,
    Relator
    V.
    HON. EDWIN A. KLEIN,
    Respondent
    Appeal from the 420th District Court
    of Nacogdoches County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. F1421200)
    ON THIS DAY came to be heard the petition for writ of mandamus filed
    by JEREMIE GLEN TENNISON, who is the relator in Cause No. F1421200, pending on the
    docket of the 420th Judicial District Court of Nacogdoches County, Texas. Said petition for writ
    of mandamus having been filed herein on September 26, 2016, and the same having been duly
    considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that a writ of mandamus should not issue, it is
    therefore CONSIDERED, ADJUDGED and ORDERED that the said petition for writ of
    mandamus be, and the same is, hereby DENIED.
    By per curiam opinion.
    Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 12-16-00270-CR

Filed Date: 9/30/2016

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/4/2016