James Wade v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.) ( 2016 )

MEMORANDUM DECISION
Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D),
this Memorandum Decision shall not be
regarded as precedent or cited before any Feb 18 2016, 8:11 am
court except for the purpose of establishing
the defense of res judicata, collateral
estoppel, or the law of the case.
ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE
Lisa M. Johnson Gregory F. Zoeller
Brownsburg, Indiana Attorney General of Indiana
Paula J. Beller
Deputy Attorney General
Indianapolis, Indiana
IN THE
COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA
James Wade, February 18, 2016
Appellant-Defendant, Court of Appeals Case No.
49A05-1505-CR-424
v. Appeal from the Marion Superior
Court
State of Indiana, The Honorable Grant W.
Appellee-Plaintiff Hawkins, Judge
Trial Court Cause No.
49G05-1404-MR-18355
Mathias, Judge.
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 49A05-1505-CR-424 | February 18, 2016 Page 1 of 6
[1] James Wade (“Wade”) was convicted in Marion Superior Court of murder and
ordered to serve a sixty-two-year sentence. Wade appeals and argues that his
conviction is not supported by sufficient evidence.
[2] We affirm.
Facts and Procedural History
[3] Wade and his girlfriend, Tracy Craig (“Craig”), often purchased drugs from
Jazmine Trammel (“Jazmine”). Wade also allowed Jazmine to use his
apartment to cook crack cocaine. In exchange, Jazmine would leave crack
cocaine and hydrocodone for Wade.
[4] On March 23, 2014, Jazmine’s body was found in a wooden chest next to a
dumpster near Wade’s apartment. Jazmine had been stabbed 86 times, and seven
of the wounds were considered fatal. Jazmine’s keys were the only personal
possession found in the chest with her body. Her cell phone and identification
were not found. Also, her sock and shoe were removed from her right foot.
Jazmine was known to keep money in her sock, and she had approximately
$3,000 in cash the morning she was murdered. Jazmine’s car, which was parked
in the parking lot of Wade’s apartment complex, was searched, and the police
did not find her identification, money, drugs, or her sock and shoe.
[5] After Jazmine’s murder, the police distributed a flyer with a photograph of the
wooden chest. Wade’s sister saw a picture of the flier and believed it was the
wooden chest that her mother had given to Wade. Wade’s sister called Wade
and told him that she had seen the chest on the news.
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 49A05-1505-CR-424 | February 18, 2016 Page 2 of 6
[6] The police obtained cell phone records that established several phone calls
between Wade’s and Jazmine’s cell phones on March 22 and the morning of
March 23, 2014. After the police determined that Wade’s address was in the
apartment complex where Jazmine was murdered, they obtained a search
warrant for his apartment.
[7] Wade’s apartment was searched on March 31, 2014. Jazmine’s blood was
found on various surfaces inside the apartment. Also, larger areas of discolored
carpet in the living room appeared to be stains caused by bleach. The carpet
was removed, and the carpet pad under the bleach stains was stained with
blood later determined to be Jazmine’s.
[8] Approximately two weeks after Jazmine was murdered and after his apartment
was searched, Wade contacted the police and admitted that the chest was his.
However, he told the police that he placed the chest outside of his apartment a
few days prior to Jazmine’s murder because he was moving and wanted to get
rid of it.
[9] Wade admitted that he allowed Jazmine to use his apartment to cook crack
cocaine on the date that she was murdered. He stated that he left his door
unlocked for Jazmine and then he went to Craig’s apartment. He claimed he
returned to his apartment a few hours later, retrieved the drugs that Jazmine left
for him, and then he returned to Craig’s apartment.
[10] Wade was charged with Jazmine’s murder on April 9, 2014. Wade’s jury trial
commenced on April 20, 2015. At trial, Wade argued that his medical conditions
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 49A05-1505-CR-424 | February 18, 2016 Page 3 of 6
rendered him physically incapable of murdering Jazmine and dragging the chest
containing her body to the dumpster near his apartment. He also argued that it
was more likely that his former girlfriend, Craig, murdered Jazmine.
[11] The jury found Wade guilty as charged. The trial court ordered Wade to serve
sixty-two years in the Department of Correction. Wade now appeals.
Standard of Review
[12] When the sufficiency of evidence is challenged, we neither reweigh the
evidence nor judge the credibility of witnesses. Chappell v. State, 966 N.E.2d
124, 129 (Ind. Ct. App. 2012) (citing McHenry v. State, 820 N.E.2d 124, 126
(Ind. 2005)), trans. denied. Rather, we recognize the exclusive province of the
trier of fact to weigh any conflicting evidence, and we consider only the
probative evidence supporting the conviction and the reasonable inferences to
be drawn therefrom. Id. If substantial evidence of probative value exists from
which a reasonable trier of fact could have drawn the conclusion that the
defendant was guilty of the crime charged beyond a reasonable doubt, then the
verdict will not be disturbed. Baumgartner v. State, 891 N.E.2d 1131, 1137 (Ind.
Ct. App. 2008). Finally, a conviction may be based upon circumstantial
evidence alone. Boggs v. State, 928 N.E.2d 855, 864 (Ind. Ct. App. 2010), trans.
denied.
Discussion and Decision
[13] Wade concedes that Jazmine was murdered inside his apartment but argues
that the State failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he committed the
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 49A05-1505-CR-424 | February 18, 2016 Page 4 of 6
murder. Specifically, Wade argues that the evidence presented at trial “merely
tends to establish a suspicion of guilt,” which is insufficient to sustain a
conviction. Appellant’s Br. at 10 (citing Baker v. State, 236 Ind. 55, 138 N.E.2d
641, 644 (1956). See also A.M. v. State, 981 N.E.2d 91, 94 (Ind. Ct. App. 2012)
(stating that “it is generally not necessary that the evidence overcomes ‘every
reasonable hypothesis of innocence.’ However, evidence that merely tends to
establish suspicion of guilt, rather than proof of it, is insufficient to sustain a
guilty verdict”) (internal citations omitted).
[14] The State presented evidence that Wade allowed Jazmine to cook crack cocaine
in his apartment in exchange for drugs as payment. Numerous phone calls were
exchanged between Wade’s cell phone and Jazmine’s cell phone on March 22
and the morning of March 23, 2014. The phone calls ceased within the time
frame of Jazmine’s murder. Jazmine’s body was placed in Wade’s wooden
chest and dragged to a nearby dumpster.
[15] Bleach was used to clean blood staining Wade’s carpet, resulting in large areas
of discoloration. Yet, when he spoke to the police, Wade claimed that when he
allegedly returned to his apartment the morning Jazmine was murdered to pick
up the drugs she left him, he did not notice the large stains on the carpet in his
apartment.
[16] Jazmine’s cousin testified that Jazmine carried money in her sock. When
Jazmine’s body was discovered, her right sock and shoe were missing. The
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 49A05-1505-CR-424 | February 18, 2016 Page 5 of 6
police did not find Jazmine’s cell phone, the crack cocaine she made in Wade’s
apartment, money, or her identification on either her person or in her vehicle.
[17] Wade’s sister became aware that the police were looking for information about
Wade’s wooden chest and mentioned it to him. However, Wade waited several
days before speaking to the police and admitting the chest was his. He also
claimed that he was moving from his apartment, but after Jazmine was
murdered, he did not return to the apartment despite the fact that he still had
clothing and possessions there, including furniture.
[18] Finally, Wade presented evidence of his medical conditions to the jury, which
the jury weighed against evidence that he was able to walk significant distances,
had no issues with performing tasks required for daily living, and that he used
drugs including crack cocaine and hydrocodone. Craig also testified at trial as to
where she and Wade were on March 22 and 23, as well as to the events that
occurred on the day Jazmine was murdered. It was within the province of the
jury to weigh Craig’s testimony, and we will not reweigh the evidence on appeal.
[19] For all of these reasons, we conclude that the State presented sufficient evidence
to prove that Wade murdered Jazmine Trammell.
[20] Affirmed.
Brown, J., concurs.
Kirsch, J., dissents.
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 49A05-1505-CR-424 | February 18, 2016 Page 6 of 6