In Re: Discipline of Andrew Taylor ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                    bar counsel updating his place of employment, areas of practice, caseload,
    restitution payments, and any issues that may have developed; (5) take
    and pass the Multistate Professional Responsibility Exam (MPRE) within
    one year after the plea is approved; and (6) pay the actual costs of the
    disciplinary proceedings, excluding bar counsel and staff salaries.
    Considering the duties violated, Taylor's mental state, the
    injury caused by Taylor's misconduct, the aggravating factors (dishonest
    or selfish motive, a pattern of misconduct, multiple offenses, vulnerability
    of the victim, and substantial experience in the law), and mitigating
    factors (absence of prior disciplinary record, timely good faith effort to
    make restitution or rectify consequences, full and free disclosure to
    disciplinary authority or cooperative attitude, delay in disciplinary
    proceedings in relation to the misconduct, and remorse),              see In re
    Discipline of Lerner, 
    124 Nev. 1232
    , 1246, 
    197 P.3d 1067
    , 1077 (2008), the
    agreed-upon discipline recommended by the hearing panel is sufficient to
    serve the purpose of attorney discipline    State Bar of Nev. v. Claiborne,
    
    104 Nev. 115
    , 213, 
    756 P.2d 464
    , 527-28 (1988) (observing that the
    purpose of attorney discipline is to protect the public, the courts, and the
    legal profession, not to punish the attorney). We therefore conclude that
    the guilty plea agreement should be approved. See SCR 113(1).
    We hereby impose an 18-month stayed suspension, a 120-day
    actual suspension, and a 2-year probationary period commencing from the
    date of this order. Taylor must comply with all of the conditions in the
    plea agreement, as outlined above, and shall pay the costs of the
    disciplinary proceedings, excluding bar counsel and staff salaries, within
    30 days from the date of this order. The parties shall comply with the
    SUPREME COURT
    OF
    NEVADA
    2
    KO 1947A    cte0
    relevant provisions of SCR 115 and 121.1
    It is so ORDERED.
    , C.J.
    J.
    Parraguirre
    Che
    Gibbons
    1/4
    N-g-   6)
    DOUGLAS, SAITTA, and PICKERING, JJ., dissenting:
    We would reject the conditional guilty plea agreement because
    the agreed-upon discipline is not sufficient. In our view, an actual
    suspension of at least six months is appropriate considering the relevant
    factors.
    J.
    Douglas
    Saitta
    SUPREME COURT
    OF
    NEVADA
    3
    (0) 1947A    e
    cc: Chair, Southern Nevada Disciplinary Board
    Lipson Neilson Cole Seltzer & Garin, P.C.
    Stan Hunterton, Bar Counsel, State Bar of Nevada
    Kimberly K. Farmer, Executive Director, State Bar of Nevada
    Perry Thompson, Admissions Office, United States Supreme Court
    SUPREME COURT
    OF
    NEVADA
    4
    (0) I.947A    4g4.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 69019

Filed Date: 12/23/2015

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 12/24/2015