Bettez v. City of Miami , 510 So. 2d 1242 ( 1987 )


Menu:
  • 510 So.2d 1242 (1987)

    Richard BETTEZ, Appellant,
    v.
    The CITY OF MIAMI, Appellee.

    No. 86-3043.

    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

    August 18, 1987.

    Alan R. Soven, Miami, for appellant.

    Weinstein, Bavly & Moon and Scott Weinstein, Miami, for appellee.

    Before HUBBART, PEARSON, DANIEL S. and FERGUSON, JJ.

    PER CURIAM.

    This is an appeal by the plaintiff Richard Bettez from an adverse final summary judgment entered below in a false arrest, false imprisonment, and malicious prosecution action. We affirm based on the following briefly stated legal analysis.

    First, we reject the plaintiff's contention that the trial court had no authority to entertain the defendant City of Miami's motion to reconsider the trial court's prior *1243 interlocutory ruling denying the defendant's motion for summary judgment, and to thereafter enter a summary judgment for the defendant. It is well settled in this state that a trial court has inherent authority to reconsider, as here, any of its interlocutory rulings prior to the entry of a final judgment or final order in the cause. The fact that the defendant mislabeled his motion as a motion for rehearing under Fla.R. Civ.P. 1.530 cannot change this result as the motion was, in substance, a proper motion for reconsideration. See Alabama Hotel Co. v. J.L. Mott Iron Works, 86 Fla. 608, 98 So. 825 (1924); Margulies v. Levy, 439 So.2d 336 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Nelson v. Cravero Constructors, Inc., 117 So.2d 764 (Fla. 3d DCA 1960); see also Commercial Garden Mall v. Success Academy, Inc., 453 So.2d 934 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984).

    Second, the record demonstrates, without dispute, that the arresting police officers were informed by witnesses to the subject incident that the plaintiff had committed an aggravated battery on a civilian; moreover, the plaintiff, without material dispute, committed a battery on an auxiliary police officer while the arresting officers were investigating the incident. This being so, the police had ample probable cause to arrest the plaintiff and, subsequently, to seek to have the plaintiff criminally prosecuted; a summary judgment for the defendant City of Miami was, therefore, entirely appropriate in this case. See DeMarie v. Jefferson Stores, Inc., 442 So.2d 1014, 1017 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Crawford v. State, 334 So.2d 141 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); Salas v. State, 246 So.2d 621 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971).

    The final summary judgment under review is, in all respects,

    Affirmed.

Document Info

Docket Number: 86-3043

Citation Numbers: 510 So. 2d 1242

Judges: Hubbart, Pearson, Daniel S. and Ferguson

Filed Date: 8/18/1987

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 7/25/2016

Cited By (17)

Hinckley v. Department of Revenue , 927 So. 2d 73 ( 2006 )

Andrews v. McGowan , 739 So. 2d 132 ( 1999 )

Wells Fargo Bank v. Sawh , 194 So. 3d 475 ( 2016 )

Whitlock v. Drazinic , 622 So. 2d 142 ( 1993 )

Consortium for Diagnostics, Inc. v. Cigna Ins. Co. , 781 So. 2d 1128 ( 2001 )

Zakak v. Broida and Napier, PA , 545 So. 2d 380 ( 1989 )

ABAMAR HOUSING & DEVELOPMENT INC. v. Lisa Daly Lady Decor, ... , 724 So. 2d 572 ( 1998 )

Bay N Gulf, Inc. v. Anchor Seafood, Inc. , 971 So. 2d 842 ( 2007 )

QIP CORP. v. Berger , 547 So. 2d 1286 ( 1989 )

AC HOLDINGS 2006, INC. v. McCarty , 985 So. 2d 1123 ( 2008 )

Lee v. Chung , 528 So. 2d 1313 ( 1988 )

BERNARDO IRIARTE v. CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORP. ( 2020 )

Ernest Steele, as personal Representative of the etc. v. ... , 197 So. 3d 106 ( 2016 )

In Re Temporary Custody of LM , 788 So. 2d 1114 ( 2001 )

Tavormina v. Timmeny , 561 So. 2d 681 ( 1990 )

Del Castillo v. Ralor Pharmacy, Inc. , 512 So. 2d 315 ( 1987 )

Hunter v. Dennies Contracting Co., Inc. , 693 So. 2d 615 ( 1997 )

View All Citing Opinions »