Rufel L. Estrada v. Tatiana Estrada ( 2017 )


Menu:
  • Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas May 4, 2017 No. 04-17-00169-CV Rufel L. ESTRADA, Appellant v. Tatiana ESTRADA, Appellee From the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2010CI00328 Honorable Solomon Casseb, III, Judge Presiding ORDER Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice On April 3, 2017, the trial court found that appellant is able to afford costs of court, appeal, and the preparation of the court reporter’s record. On the same day, appellant filed a motion in this court seeking review of the trial court’s order. On April 5, 2017, we ordered the preparation of a limited clerk’s record and reporter’s record for purposes of conducting a review of the trial court’s order. These records were timely filed in this court on or before April 21, 2017. We then conducted a review of the trial court’s order. On May 2, 2017, we issued an order affirming the trial court’s April 3, 2017 order finding that appellant is able to afford costs of court, appeal, and the preparation of the court reporter’s record. On May 3, 2017, appellant filed a second motion seeking review of the trial court’s order in which he asserts that, because this court did not grant his motion for review within ten days of filing the motion, his motion was granted by operation of law. For support, appellant cites Rule 20.1(j)(4) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. However, Rule 20.1 was amended in 2016 to delete the provision on which appellant relies. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1. Furthermore, Rule 145 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure now governs a party’s claim that he is unable to afford costs for preparation of the appellate record. The current version of Rule 145 requires this court to rule on a motion for review “at the earliest practicable time,” but it does not otherwise set a deadline for this court’s ruling on the motion. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 145(g)(4). Therefore, appellant’s second motion for review, which we construe as a motion to reconsider our May 2, 2017 order affirming the trial court’s order, is DENIED. The clerk’s record and the reporter’s record for this appeal remain due on May 5, 2017. _________________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 4th day of May, 2017. ___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-17-00169-CV

Filed Date: 5/4/2017

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 5/5/2017