Petty v. Padula , 368 F. App'x 404 ( 2010 )


Menu:
  •                              UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 09-7861
    GARY L. PETTY,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    v.
    ANTHONY J. PADULA, Warden at Lee Correctional Institution,
    Respondent - Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Rock Hill. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge.
    (0:08-cv-02967-RBH)
    Submitted:   February 25, 2010             Decided:   March 4, 2010
    Before DUNCAN and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Gary L. Petty, Appellant Pro Se.     Donald John Zelenka, Deputy
    Assistant Attorney General, William Edgar Salter, III, Assistant
    Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Gary L. Petty seeks to appeal the district court’s
    order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
    denying as untimely his 
    28 U.S.C. § 2254
     (2006) petition.                                  The
    order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues
    a certificate of appealability.                     
    28 U.S.C. § 2253
    (c)(1) (2006).
    A    certificate        of    appealability           will     not     issue     absent    “a
    substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.”
    
    28 U.S.C. § 2253
    (c)(2)         (2006).          A     prisoner      satisfies      this
    standard    by     demonstrating          that      reasonable       jurists     would    find
    that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district
    court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural
    ruling by the district court is likewise debatable.                               Miller-El
    v. Cockrell, 
    537 U.S. 322
    , 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 
    529 U.S. 473
    , 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 
    252 F.3d 676
    , 683-84 (4th
    Cir.    2001).         We    have    independently          reviewed       the   record   and
    conclude        that    Petty       has   not       made     the     requisite     showing.
    Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss
    the appeal.        We dispense with oral argument because the facts
    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
    before    the     court      and    argument        would    not     aid   the   decisional
    process.
    DISMISSED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 09-7861

Citation Numbers: 368 F. App'x 404

Judges: Agee, Duncan, Hamilton, Per Curiam

Filed Date: 3/4/2010

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/7/2023