In the Matter of W.S., Alleged to Be Seriously Mentally Impaired ( 2019 )


Menu:
  •                      IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA
    No. 18-0702
    Filed March 6, 2019
    IN THE MATTER OF W.S.,
    Alleged to Be Seriously Mentally Impaired,
    W.S.,
    Respondent-Appellant.
    ________________________________________________________________
    Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Johnson County, Paul D. Miller,
    Judge.
    W.S. appeals from an order finding he remains seriously mentally impaired.
    APPEAL DISMISSED.
    Cami Eslick of Eslick Law, Indianola, for appellant.
    Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Gretchen Kraemer, Assistant
    Attorney General, for appellee State.
    Considered by Potterfield, P.J., Doyle, J., and Blane, S.J.*
    *Senior judge assigned by order pursuant to Iowa Code section 602.9206 (2019).
    2
    POTTERFIELD, Presiding Judge.
    On March 20, 2018, the district court found W.S. remained seriously
    mentally impaired. On April 20, W.S. appealed the order, arguing the State failed
    to prove he lacked sufficient judgment to make reasonable decisions about his
    treatment and there was not substantial evidence of dangerousness because there
    was no evidence of a recent overt act, attempt, or threat.
    Before this case was transferred to our court, the supreme court raised on
    its own motion the issue of jurisdiction after it appeared notice of appeal might
    be untimely. See Root v. Toney, 
    841 N.W.2d 83
    , 87 (Iowa 2013) (noting court is
    to address jurisdictional issue of timeliness of appeal before reaching merits even
    if parties do not raise the issue). W.S. was ordered to file a statement concerning
    whether this court has jurisdiction to hear the appeal, and the State was permitted
    to file a response. Counsel for W.S. states that she “had neglected to take into
    account that there are [thirty-one] days in January” and argues we should excuse
    her neglect in filing the appeal one day late and consider the appeal on its merits.1
    The State argues we do not have jurisdiction to consider this appeal. The supreme
    court ordered the jurisdictional issue be considered with the appeal and transferred
    the appeal to our court.
    Iowa Rule of Appellate Procedure 6.101 provides that notices of appeal
    must be filed within thirty days after the filing of the final order or judgment. Timely
    notice of appeal is jurisdictional. Jensen v. State, 
    312 N.W.2d 581
    , 582 (Iowa
    1
    We note that the number of days in January did not affect the timeliness of the notice of
    appeal here, although the number of days in March does affect the calculation of thirty
    days.
    3
    1981). It was within W.S.’s control to appeal in a timely fashion. Counsel’s mistake
    is not an extraordinary circumstance like those for which we have previously
    granted delayed appeals. See, e.g., In re L.H., 
    890 N.W.2d 333
    , 339 (Iowa Ct.
    App. 2016) (allowing delayed appeal where the self-represented appellant filed the
    appeal in the wrong court and the appeal would have been timely if filed within the
    correct court). Because the appeal was not timely filed, we lack jurisdiction to
    consider the merits of the appeal. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
    APPEAL DISMISSED.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 18-0702

Filed Date: 3/6/2019

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 3/6/2019