-
Per Curiam, We find nothing in either of the specifications of error that would justify a reversal or modification of the judgment. The Superior Court was clearly right in holding that the second proviso in the first section of the act of April 15, 1891, is unconstitutional and void. Its judgment is so fully vindicated in the opinion sent up with the record that it is unnecessary to add anything to the reasons therein given.
Judgment affirmed.
Document Info
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 445
Citation Numbers: 181 Pa. 390
Judges: Dean, Green, McCollum, Mitchell, Stereett
Filed Date: 5/24/1897
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 2/17/2022