-
VENTERS, Justice, concurring in result only:
I concur with the majority on all points but one. The majority holds that an indictment is sufficiently specific if it simply “names the offense.” I disagree and respectfully submit that RCr 6.10(2), which
*679 was promulgated by this Court, requires that the indictment contain a statement of “the essential facts constituting the offense,” which is something more than simply naming the offense. I concur in result because the indictment in this case complies with RCr 6.10(2).
Document Info
Docket Number: 2006-SC-000102-MR
Citation Numbers: 291 S.W.3d 647
Judges: Abramson, Cunningham, Minton, Noble, Schroder, Scott, Venters
Filed Date: 5/21/2009
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 8/24/2023