United States v. Camille Armstrong , 695 F. App'x 806 ( 2017 )

Case: 17-40018 Document: 00514120864 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/17/2017
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
United States Court of Appeals
Fif h Circuit
No. 17-40018 FILED
Summary Calendar August 17, 2017
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff−Appellee,
versus
CAMILLE DIANE ARMSTRONG,
Defendant−Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 2:16-CR-657-1
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
Camille Armstrong appeals her conviction of conspiring to possess with
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in
5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Case: 17-40018 Document: 00514120864 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/17/2017
No. 17-40018
intent to distribute more than 50 grams of methamphetamine, in violation of
21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(A) and 21 U.S.C. § 846. She asserts that the
factual basis for her guilty plea was inadequate because the government failed
to meet its obligation to prove that she had knowledge of the quantity of actual
methamphetamine involved in her offense.
As Armstrong concedes, her argument is foreclosed by United States
v. Betancourt, 586 F.3d 303, 308−09 (5th Cir. 2009), which held that Flores-
Figueroa v. United States, 556 U.S. 646 (2009), did not overturn United States
v. Gamez-Gonzalez, 319 F.3d 695 (5th Cir. 2003), and that the government is
not required to prove knowledge of drug type and quantity as an element of a
§ 841 drug offense. Accordingly, the motion for summary disposition is
GRANTED, and the judgment is AFFIRMED.
2