Maas v. Maas' Adm'r , 255 S.W.2d 497 ( 1952 )

CAMMACK, C. J., and COMBS, J.,

dissent for the reason that appellant’s misconduct in -connection with this litigation has been shown to be so shocking, unconscionable and reprehensible that a court of equity should not entertain his petition nor lend its aid to him in- his effort to seek equitable relief.