In Re: Committee on Bar Admissions Cfn 852981 ( 2017 )


Menu:
  •                          Supreme Court of Louisiana
    FOR IMMEDIATE NEWS RELEASE                                         NEWS RELEASE #062
    FROM: CLERK OF SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
    The Opinions handed down on the 14th day of December, 2017, are as follows:
    PER CURIAM:
    2017-BA-0065      IN RE: COMMITTEE ON BAR ADMISSIONS CFN 852981
    Considering the commissioner’s recommendation and the entire
    record of this proceeding, we conclude petitioner is eligible to
    be admitted to the practice of law in Louisiana.
    ADMISSION GRANTED.
    12/14/17
    SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
    NO. 2017-BA-0065
    IN RE: COMMITTEE ON BAR ADMISSIONS CFN-852981
    BAR ADMISSIONS PROCEEDING
    PER CURIAM
    Petitioner successfully passed the Louisiana Bar Examination. However, the
    Committee on Bar Admissions (“Committee”) advised petitioner that it was unable
    to certify him for admission to the bar on character and fitness grounds. Specifically,
    the Committee cited petitioner’s record of criminal offenses, as well as his failure to
    fully disclose his criminal history when he applied to law school.
    Petitioner then applied to this court for admission to the practice of law. We
    remanded the matter to the Committee on Bar Admissions Panel on Character and
    Fitness to conduct an investigation and appointed a commissioner to take character
    and fitness evidence.
    Following the proceedings, the commissioner filed his report with this court,
    recommending petitioner be admitted to the practice of law. The commissioner
    noted that petitioner’s criminal offenses were committed from 2005 to 2008, when
    he was a teenager. No similar occurrences appear in his history since that time.
    Further, regarding petitioner’s failure to disclose his criminal history on his law
    school application in response to a question seeking disclosure of offenses resolved
    through deferred adjudication, the commissioner found that petitioner’s explanation
    for the omission was credible, resulting from his lack of understanding of the law
    governing dismissal of his charges.
    The Committee filed an objection to the commissioner’s recommendation,
    and oral argument was conducted before this court pursuant to Supreme Court Rule
    XVII, § 9(D)(11).
    Considering the commissioner’s recommendation and the entire record of this
    proceeding, we conclude petitioner is eligible to be admitted to the practice of law
    in Louisiana.
    ADMISSION GRANTED.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2017-BA-0065

Judges: PER CURIAM

Filed Date: 12/14/2017

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 12/14/2017