Fowler v. Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2018 )


Menu:
  •          In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    No. 16-1538V
    Filed: October 5, 2017
    UNPUBLISHED
    RAYMOND FOWLER,
    Special Processing Unit (SPU); Joint
    Petitioner,                          Stipulation on Damages;
    v.                                                       Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine;
    Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND                                  Administration (SIRVA)
    HUMAN SERVICES,
    Respondent.
    Bruce William Slane, Law Office of Bruce W. Slane, P.C., White Plains, NY, for
    petitioner.
    Linda Sara Renzi, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
    DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION 1
    Dorsey, Chief Special Master:
    On November 17, 2016, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the
    National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq., 2 (the
    “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine
    administration (“SIRVA”) caused by his February 24, 2016 pneumococcal (“Prevnar”)
    vaccine. Petition at 1; Stipulation, filed October 5, 2017, at ¶ 4. Petitioner further
    alleges that he experienced residual effects of his injury for more than six months and
    that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action for damages on his
    behalf as a result of his condition. Petition at 4; Stipulation at ¶¶ 4-5. “Respondent
    denies that the Prevnar vaccine is the cause of petitioner’s alleged SIRVA or any other
    injury, or his current condition. ” Stipulation at ¶ 6.
    1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the
    undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with
    the E-Government Act of 2002. 
    44 U.S.C. § 3501
     note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of
    Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to
    identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an
    unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits
    within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.
    2National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 
    100 Stat. 3755
    . Hereinafter, for
    ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
    300aa (2012).
    Nevertheless, on October 5, 2017, the parties filed the attached joint stipulation,
    stating that a decision should be entered awarding compensation. The undersigned
    finds the stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the decision of the Court in awarding
    damages, on the terms set forth therein.
    Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Stipulation, the undersigned
    awards the following compensation:
    A lump sum of $65,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner.
    Stipulation at ¶ 8. This amount represents compensation for all items of
    damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Id.
    The undersigned approves the requested amount for petitioner’s compensation.
    In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of
    the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision. 3
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    s/Nora Beth Dorsey
    Nora Beth Dorsey
    Chief Special Master
    3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
    renouncing the right to seek review.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 16-1538

Judges: Nora Beth Dorsey

Filed Date: 2/14/2018

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021