Vossberg, Brent Joseph AKA Vossberg, Brent ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •              IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
    OF TEXAS
    NO. WR-84,522-01
    EX PARTE BRENT JOSEPH VOSSBERG, Applicant
    ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
    CAUSE NO. W13-12238J(A) IN THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 3
    FROM DALLAS COUNTY
    Per curiam.
    ORDER
    Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
    clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte
    Young, 
    418 S.W.2d 824
    , 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of possession of
    cocaine with intent to deliver and sentenced to fifteen years’ imprisonment.
    Applicant complains, inter alia, of trial counsel’s representation at Applicant’s trial, and he
    alleges that he was denied his right to appeal. There is no response from counsel.
    Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington,
    
    466 U.S. 668
    (1984); Ex parte Patterson, 
    993 S.W.2d 114
    , 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999); Ex parte
    Axel, 
    757 S.W.2d 369
    (Tex. Crim. App. 1988). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed.
    2
    As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 
    334 S.W.2d 294
    , 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is
    the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall order counsel to respond to
    Applicant’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel and to state whether he advised Applicant of
    his appellate rights. See Jones v. State, 
    98 S.W.3d 700
    , 703 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003). The trial court
    may use any means set out in TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).
    If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent.
    If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an
    attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.
    The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to Applicant’s claims
    and whether Applicant was denied his right to a meaningful appeal through no fault of his own. The
    trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant
    and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claim for habeas corpus relief.
    This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The
    issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all
    affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or
    deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall
    be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall
    be obtained from this Court.
    Filed: March 9, 2016
    Do not publish