Gerald Taylor v. LTAC Hospital of Feliciana, LLC d/b/a AMG Specialty Hospital ( 2022 )


Menu:
  •                                STATE OF LOUISIANA
    COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
    GERALD       TAYLOR                                                                            NO.          2021       CW    1232
    VERSUS
    LTAC    HOSPITAL           OF    FELICIANA,                                                             MARCH          4,   2022
    LLC    D/ B/ A   AMG       SPECIALTY
    HOSPITAL
    In    Re:        LTAC          Hospital           of     Feliciana,                 LLC    D/ B/ A          AMC        Specialty
    Hospital,                  applying               for         supervisory                   writs,            19th
    Judicial           District           Court,           Parish          of      East        Baton          Rouge,
    No.       698791.
    BEFORE:          GUIDRY,          HOLDRIDGE,             AND       CHUTZ,          JJ.
    WRIT        GRANTED.              The     judgment           of        the        district            court           dated
    September           20,        2021,           denying        the        motion           for        summary            judgment
    filed by         defendant,                LTAC       Hospital           of     Feliciana,                  LLC     D/ B/ A     AMC
    Specialty          Hospital,              is     reversed.           As       to     his       medical            malpractice
    claims,       the      plaintiff,               Gerald        Taylor,          failed           to      produce             factual
    support       sufficient              to       establish       the        existence             of      a    genuine          issue
    of    material            fact       as     to    a     causal           link       between            the        defendant' s
    alleged       negligent              action        and       the    plaintiff' s                injury,           which        is   a
    necessary          element           of     his       claim.        See       La.     R. S.       9:    2794( A);            Samaha
    v. Rau, 2007- 1726 (                  La.       2/ 26/ 08),         
    977 So. 2d 880
    ,         883- 4.          Further,
    regarding           the         plaintiff'         s     negligent                 infliction                of        emotional
    distress         claims,         he       failed       to    produce           factual          support            sufficient
    to    establish            a     genuine           issue       of        material              fact         regarding           the
    emotional          severity of his                    damages,           which       is    an     essential                 element
    of    his    claim.        See       Moresi       v.     State       Through             Department               of    Wildlife
    and    Fisheries,              
    567 So. 2d 1081
    ,       1095 (         La.        1990).             Therefore,          the
    motion       for     summary           judgment             filed        by    the        defendant            is       granted,
    and    the    plaintiff' s             claims          are    dismissed.
    JMG
    GH
    WRC
    COURT       OF APPEAL,           FIRST         CIRCUIT
    DEPUTY       CLERK        OF    COURT
    FOR    THE        COURT
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2021CW1232

Filed Date: 3/4/2022

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 3/4/2022