Enyew v. Ashcroft ( 2004 )

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-1143 ROMAN TEMESGEN ENYEW, Petitioner, versus JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A79-477-509) Submitted: August 18, 2004 Decided: September 15, 2004 Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and KING, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Roman Temesgen Enyew, Petitioner Pro Se. Arthur H. Gottlieb, IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Baltimore, Maryland; Jennifer J. Keeney, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Roman Temesgen Enyew, a native and citizen of Ethiopia, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals dismissing her appeal from the immigration judge’s denial of her applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. We have reviewed the administrative record and the Board’s order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review on the reasoning of the Board. See In re: Enyew, No. A79-477-509 (B.I.A. Jan. 5, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED - 2 -