Kimberly Shareef v. Patrick Donahoe ( 2013 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1806
KIMBERLY F. SHAREEF,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
PATRICK R. DONAHOE,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
DAVID MILLS; RODNEY K. DEFLUMERI,
Defendants.
No. 13-2078
KIMBERLY F. SHAREEF,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
PATRICK R. DONAHOE,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
DAVID MILLS; RODNEY K. DEFLUMERI,
Defendants.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. David C. Keesler,
Magistrate Judge. (3:11-cv-00615-DCK)
Submitted: October 15, 2013 Decided: October 17, 2013
Before WILKINSON and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kimberly F. Shareef, Appellant Pro Se. James Michael Sullivan,
Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
In No. 13-1806, Kimberly F. Shareef seeks to appeal
the district court’s order denying her motion for appointment of
counsel. In No. 13-2078, Shareef seeks to appeal the district
court’s order denying her motion to compel and her motion for
sanctions. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final
orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and
collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P.
54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541,
545-46 (1949). The orders Shareef seeks to appeal are neither
final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals for lack of jurisdiction.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
3