-
PER CURIAM. *315John Paul Heinz appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).
Document Info
Docket Number: No. ED 105457
Citation Numbers: 544 S.W.3d 314
Filed Date: 4/3/2018
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 1/21/2022