People of Michigan v. Everege Vernor Dickens ( 2015 )


Menu:
  • Order                                                                                        Michigan Supreme Court
    Lansing, Michigan
    November 24, 2015                                                                                    Robert P. Young, Jr.,
    Chief Justice
    149906 & (48)                                                                                        Stephen J. Markman
    Brian K. Zahra
    Bridget M. McCormack
    David F. Viviano
    Richard H. Bernstein
    PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,                                                                          Joan L. Larsen,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,                                                                                       Justices
    v                                                                 SC: 149906
    COA: 314267
    Oakland CC: 2012-241989-FC
    EVEREGE VERNOR DICKENS,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    _________________________________________/
    On order of the Court, the motion to amend is GRANTED. The application for
    leave to appeal the June 17, 2014 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and,
    pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE in part
    the judgment of the Court of Appeals, and we REMAND this case to the Oakland Circuit
    Court to determine whether the court would have imposed a materially different sentence
    under the sentencing procedure described in People v Lockridge, 
    498 Mich. 358
    (2015).
    On remand, the trial court shall follow the procedure described in Part VI of our opinion.
    If the trial court determines that it would have imposed the same sentence absent the
    unconstitutional constraint on its discretion, it may reaffirm the original sentence. If,
    however, the trial court determines that it would not have imposed the same sentence
    absent the unconstitutional constraint on its discretion, it shall resentence the defendant.
    In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the
    remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
    We do not retain jurisdiction.
    I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the
    foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
    November 24, 2015
    p1116
    Clerk
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 149906

Filed Date: 11/24/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/26/2015