Woodworth v. Sasseen , 226 A.D. 698 ( 1929 )


Menu:
  • Order denying motion to vacate notice of examination before trial affirmed, with -ten dollars costs and disbursements. *699Examination to proceed on five days’ notice. No opinion. Rich, Kapper and Seeger, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., and Young, J., dissent upon the ground that issue has not been joined as to the counterclaim and that the notice of examination was premature.

Document Info

Docket Number: Appeal No. 1

Citation Numbers: 226 A.D. 698

Filed Date: 3/15/1929

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/3/2022