United States v. Robert Beal , 928 F.2d 467 ( 1991 )

928 F.2d 467

289 U.S.App.D.C. 55

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.
UNITED STATES of America
v.
Robert BEAL, Appellant

No. 90-3147.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

March 26, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, Cr. No. 89-0497-1.

D.D.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before D.H. GINSBURG, SENTELLE and RANDOLPH, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

1

This appeal was considered on the record on appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for a published opinion. See D.C.Cir. Rule 14(c). It is

2

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court's oral ruling of January 25, 1990, be affirmed. The record supports a finding that Beal was not seized and that he consented to the search of his tote bag. See United States v. Winston, 892 F.2d 112 (D.C.Cir.1989), cert. denied, 110 S.Ct. 3277 (1990); United States v. Battista, 876 F.2d 201, 207-08 (D.C.Cir.1989).

3

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir. Rule 15.