State Of Washington, Resp. v. Stacey Annie Jamison A/k/a Stacey Annie Ives, App. ( 2014 )

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
STATE OF WASHINGTON,
No. 70409-5-1
Respondent,
DIVISION ONE
v.
c_
m
UNPUBLISHED OPINION
3^
STACEY ANNIE JAMISON
cr.
AKA STACEY ANNIE IVES,
S3»
'<'•
Appellant. FILED: June 16' 2014 ~"
UD
~z
o
Trickey, J. — Stacey Annie Jamison appeals her conviction for third degree
assault.1 She contends the court's to-convict instruction removed a disputed issue of fact
from the jury's consideration and commented on the evidence. But she affirmatively
agreed with the proposed instruction.2 Under the invited error doctrine, "even where
constitutional rights are involved, we are precluded from reviewing jury instructions when
the defendant has proposed an instruction or agreed to its wording." State v. Wininqs.
126 Wash. App. 75, 89, 107 P.3d 141 (2005). Here, Jamison expressed affirmative
agreement to the instruction by joining in the State's proposed instructions. She cannot
now challenge that instruction. Although the issue could be reviewed through an
ineffective assistance of counsel claim, In re Pers. Restraint of Wilson, 169 Wash. App. 379,
388, 279 P.3d 990 (2012), Jamison has not raised such a claim in this appeal.
Affirmed.
WE CONCUR:
1 Clerk's Papers at 14.
2 Report of Proceedings (April 2, 2013) at 168-69.