United States v. Juan Ruiz-Rivera , 598 F. App'x 304 ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •      Case: 14-40473      Document: 00512978409         Page: 1    Date Filed: 03/23/2015
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    No. 14-40473                                   FILED
    Summary Calendar                            March 23, 2015
    Lyle W. Cayce
    Clerk
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee
    v.
    JUAN RUIZ-RIVERA,
    Defendant-Appellant
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of Texas
    USDC No. 7:13-CR-1443
    Before DAVIS, CLEMENT, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM: *
    Juan Ruiz-Rivera appeals the 92-month sentence imposed following his
    guilty plea conviction for conspiracy to harbor illegal aliens. A teenage girl
    smuggled in the course of this conspiracy died from heat stroke.
    Ruiz-Rivera argues that the district court erred in applying the nine-
    level enhancement pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.1(b)(2)(C). He contends that
    the court relied on the Presentence Report (PSR) in imposing the enhancement
    * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
    be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
    CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 14-40473   Document: 00512978409     Page: 2   Date Filed: 03/23/2015
    No. 14-40473
    and that the PSR contained unreliable information. We review this issue for
    clear error. See United States v. Betancourt, 
    422 F.3d 240
    , 244-45 (5th Cir.
    2005).
    Section 2L1.1(b)(2)(C) provides that a defendant will receive a nine-level
    enhancement if the offense involved the harboring of 100 or more illegal aliens.
    The district court, relying on information in the PSR, found that the instant
    offense involved 132 aliens.     The defendant has the burden of presenting
    evidence to show that the facts contained in the PSR are inaccurate or
    materially untrue. United States v. Alaniz, 
    726 F.3d 586
    , 619 (5th Cir. 2013).
    Given the lack of rebuttal evidence provided by Ruiz-Rivera as to the number
    of illegal aliens harbored, the PSR’s calculation was not implausible and,
    therefore, was not clearly erroneous. See id.; see also 
    Betancourt, 422 F.3d at 247
    .
    Ruiz-Rivera also challenges the application of a two-level enhancement
    under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.1(b)(6) based on a finding that the offense involved
    intentionally or recklessly creating a substantial risk of death or serious bodily
    injury. He contends that evidence the house was chained and padlocked is
    insufficient to support the enhancement. He further asserts that the evidence
    that a GMC SUV was used to transport 24 aliens is insufficient to support the
    enhancement.
    The objections to this enhancement argued by Ruiz-Rivera in the district
    court did not sufficiently apprise the court of the basis of the challenge to the
    enhancement he now asserts on appeal. Therefore, we review the issue for
    plain error. See United States v. Hinojosa, 
    749 F.3d 407
    , 413 (5th Cir. 2014).
    Section 2L1.1(b)(6) provides for a two-level increase “[i]f the offense
    involved intentionally or recklessly creating a substantial risk of death or
    serious bodily injury to another person.” Though the house was equipped with
    2
    Case: 14-40473    Document: 00512978409     Page: 3   Date Filed: 03/23/2015
    No. 14-40473
    water, electricity, and air conditioning, the photographs of the house show
    limited furniture. Additionally, all of the windows were equipped with burglar
    bars. The exits of the house, the front porch and gate, were chained and
    padlocked. On at least one known occasion, 24 aliens were harbored at the
    stash house. This evidence is sufficient to support the enhancement. See
    United States v. Zuniga-Amezquita, 
    468 F.3d 886
    , 887-88 (5th Cir. 2006).
    Moreover, 24 passengers in the vehicle are “substantially more” than the
    vehicle’s maximum load capacity of 8. See § 2L1.1, comment. (n.5). Ruiz-
    Rivera fails to show that the district court committed plain or obvious error in
    the application of this enhancement. See Puckett v. United States, 
    556 U.S. 129
    , 135 (2009).
    The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 14-40473

Citation Numbers: 598 F. App'x 304

Filed Date: 3/23/2015

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 1/13/2023