People of Michigan v. Lamar Quantrell Roberts ( 2007 )


Menu:
  • Order                                                                                        Michigan Supreme Court
    Lansing, Michigan
    November 2, 2007                                                                                       Clifford W. Taylor,
    Chief Justice
    130207                                                                                               Michael F. Cavanagh
    Elizabeth A. Weaver
    Marilyn Kelly
    Maura D. Corrigan
    PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,                                                                     Robert P. Young, Jr.
    Plaintiff-Appellee,                                                                        Stephen J. Markman,
    Justices
    v                                                                 SC: 130207
    COA: 252100
    Wayne CC: 02-014804-02
    LAMAR QUANTRELL ROBERTS,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    _________________________________________/
    By order of September 14, 2006, the application for leave to appeal the November
    1, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in
    People v Smith (Docket No. 130353). On order of the Court, the case having been
    decided on June 20, 2007, 
    478 Mich 292
     (2007), the application is again considered, and
    it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be
    reviewed by this Court.
    CORRIGAN, J. concurs and states as follows:
    I join the order denying leave to appeal. I write separately only to observe that, in
    an appropriate case, this Court should address whether to apply the rationale of People v
    Smith, 
    478 Mich 292
     (2007), to a case where the defendant was convicted of felony
    murder and the predicate felony. In light of our decision in Smith, the holding in People
    v Wilder, 
    411 Mich 328
     (1981), is now in question. But because the defendant in Smith
    had not been convicted of the predicate felony, we did not in that case consider whether
    Wilder should be overruled. Although we should address this issue in an appropriate
    case, defendant here failed to preserve the Wilder issue. Therefore, I concur in the denial
    of leave to appeal.
    KELLY, J., would remand this case for correction of the judgment of sentence.
    I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the
    foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
    November 2, 2007                    _________________________________________
    p1030                                                               Clerk
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 130207

Filed Date: 11/2/2007

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/31/2014