Keith Smith v. City of Detroit , 928 N.W.2d 219 ( 2019 )


Menu:
  • Order                                                                      Michigan Supreme Court
    Lansing, Michigan
    June 14, 2019                                                                 Bridget M. McCormack,
    Chief Justice
    158300 & (44)                                                                      David F. Viviano,
    Chief Justice Pro Tem
    Stephen J. Markman
    Brian K. Zahra
    KEITH SMITH,                                                                    Richard H. Bernstein
    Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant,                                   Elizabeth T. Clement
    Megan K. Cavanagh,
    Justices
    v                                                      SC: 158300
    COA: 337708
    Wayne CC: 15-001269-NO
    CITY OF DETROIT,
    Defendant/Cross-Plaintiff,
    and
    MERLO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.,
    Defendant/Cross-Defendant-
    Appellant/Cross-Appellee,
    and
    RAUHORN ELECTRIC, INC.,
    Defendant/Cross-Defendant/
    Cross-Plaintiff,
    and
    PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF MICHIGAN, INC.,
    and POCO, INC.,
    Defendants/Cross-Defendants.
    __________________________________________/
    On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 24, 2018
    judgment of the Court of Appeals and the application for leave to appeal as cross-
    appellant are considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on the
    application for leave to appeal as cross-appellant. MCR 7.305(H)(1).
    The plaintiff cross-appellant shall file a supplemental brief within 42 days of the
    date of this order addressing whether the defendant cross-appellee maintained possession
    and control over the sidewalk such that plaintiff’s claim sounded in premises liability
    rather than ordinary negligence. Compare Orel v Uni-Rak Sales Co Inc, 
    454 Mich. 564
                                                                                                                    2
    (1997), and Finazzo v Fire Equip Co, 
    323 Mich. App. 620
    (2018), with Fraim v City
    Sewer of Flint, 
    474 Mich. 1101
    (2006). In addition to the brief, the plaintiff shall
    electronically file an appendix conforming to MCR 7.312(D)(2). In the brief, citations to
    the record must provide the appendix page numbers as required by MCR 7.312(B)(1).
    The defendant shall file a supplemental brief within 21 days of being served with the
    plaintiff’s brief. The defendant shall also electronically file an appendix, or in the
    alternative, stipulate to the use of the appendix filed by the plaintiff. A reply, if any, must
    be filed by the plaintiff within 14 days of being served with the defendant’s brief. The
    parties should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.
    The Michigan Association for Justice, Michigan Defense Trial Counsel, Inc., and
    the Negligence Section of the State Bar of Michigan are invited to file briefs amicus
    curiae. Other persons or groups interested in the determination of the issue presented in
    this case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.
    The application for leave to appeal remains pending.
    I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the
    foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
    June 14, 2019
    a0611
    Clerk
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 158300

Citation Numbers: 928 N.W.2d 219

Filed Date: 6/14/2019

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 1/12/2023