Emily R Varran v. Peter J Granneman ( 2014 )


Menu:
  • Order                                                                       Michigan Supreme Court
    Lansing, Michigan
    December 23, 2014                                                                 Robert P. Young, Jr.,
    Chief Justice
    Michael F. Cavanagh
    Stephen J. Markman
    150319 & (16)                                                                          Mary Beth Kelly
    Brian K. Zahra
    Bridget M. McCormack
    David F. Viviano,
    Justices
    EMILY R. VARRAN, a Minor, by her Next Friend,
    JULIA M. VARRAN,
    Plaintiff,
    v                                                      SC: 150319
    COA: 322437
    Washtenaw CC: 03-000271-DC
    PETER J. GRANNEMAN,
    Defendant-Appellant,
    and
    DEBORAH GRANNEMAN and JAMES
    GRANNEMAN,
    Intervenors-Appellees.
    _________________________________________/
    On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 16, 2014 order
    the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting
    leave to appeal, we VACATE the order of the Court of Appeals and we REMAND this
    case to the Court of Appeals for further consideration. On remand, we DIRECT the
    Court of Appeals to issue an opinion specifically addressing the issue of whether an order
    regarding grandparenting time may affect custody within the meaning of MCR
    7.202(6)(a)(iii), or otherwise be appealable by right under MCR 7.203(A). If the Court of
    Appeals determines that the Washtenaw Circuit Court Family Division’s orders are
    appealable by right, it shall take jurisdiction over the defendant-appellant’s claim of
    appeal and address its merits. If the Court of Appeals determines that the Washtenaw
    Circuit Court Family Division’s orders are not appealable by right, it may then dismiss
    the defendant-appellant’s claim of appeal for lack of jurisdiction, or exercise its
    discretion to treat the claim of appeal as an application for leave to appeal and grant the
    application. See Wardell v Hincka, 
    297 Mich App 127
    , 133 n 1 (2012).
    We direct the Court of Appeals’ attention to the fact that we are also remanding
    the related case of Varran v Granneman (Docket No. 150274) and that the related cases,
    2
    Varran v Granneman (Court of Appeals Docket Nos. 324412 and 324763), are currently
    pending in the Court of Appeals.
    The motion to consolidate is DENIED without prejudice to a party filing a motion
    to consolidate in the Court of Appeals.
    I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the
    foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
    December 23, 2014
    s1222
    Clerk
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 150319

Filed Date: 12/23/2014

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 12/31/2014