People of Michigan v. Cody Jason-Christopher Patton ( 2015 )


Menu:
  • Order                                                                                        Michigan Supreme Court
    Lansing, Michigan
    February 6, 2015                                                                                     Robert P. Young, Jr.,
    Chief Justice
    150006 & (11)                                                                                        Stephen J. Markman
    Mary Beth Kelly
    Brian K. Zahra
    Bridget M. McCormack
    David F. Viviano
    PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,                                                                    Richard H. Bernstein,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,                                                                                       Justices
    v                                                                 SC: 150006
    COA: 322521
    Macomb CC: 2011-004463-FH
    CODY JASON-CHRISTOPHER PATTON,                                                2011-003714-FH
    Defendant-Appellant.
    _________________________________________/
    On order of the Court, the motion to add a new issue is GRANTED. The
    application for leave to appeal the July 25, 2014 order of the Court of Appeals is
    considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we
    REMAND this case to the Macomb Circuit Court to provide the defendant the
    opportunity to withdraw his plea, for the reason that the trial court failed to adhere to the
    court’s sentence evaluation provided at the plea hearing or to allow the defendant to
    withdraw his plea. People v Cobbs, 
    443 Mich. 276
    (1993); MCR 6.302(C)(3). We are
    not persuaded that the standards set forth in People v Hill, 
    221 Mich. App. 391
    , 398
    (1997), require reassigning the case to a different judge. We further ORDER the trial
    court to determine, in accordance with Administrative Order 2003-03, whether the
    defendant is indigent and, if so, to appoint counsel to represent him in connection with
    the remand proceedings. In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we
    are not persuaded that the remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this
    Court.
    We do not retain jurisdiction.
    I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the
    foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
    February 6, 2015
    t0203
    Clerk
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 150006

Filed Date: 2/6/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/7/2015