People of Michigan v. Lionel Eric Turner ( 2011 )


Menu:
  • Order                                                                                        Michigan Supreme Court
    Lansing, Michigan
    May 13, 2011                                                                                         Robert P. Young, Jr.,
    Chief Justice
    141745                                                                                               Michael F. Cavanagh
    Marilyn Kelly
    PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,                                                                     Stephen J. Markman
    Diane M. Hathaway
    Plaintiff-Appellee,                                                                            Mary Beth Kelly
    Brian K. Zahra,
    v                                                                 SC: 141745                                        Justices
    COA: 298839
    Wayne CC: 09-018198-01-FJ
    LIONEL ERIC TURNER,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    _________________________________________/
    On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 4, 2010 order
    of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of
    granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Wayne Circuit Court for further
    proceedings consistent with MCR 6.310(C).
    Although the plea agreement negotiated between the prosecutor and defendant was
    not predicated upon a statement by the Court that it would sentence defendant to a
    specified term or within a specified range, see People v Cobbs, 
    443 Mich 276
     (1993), the
    circuit court gratuitously “promised” that it would sentence defendant to “the low-end of
    the guidelines” range if defendant “entered into” the plea. After acknowledging and
    accepting the circuit court’s promise, defendant entered guilty pleas to kidnapping,
    carjacking, armed robbery, five counts of first-degree criminal sexual conduct, second-
    degree criminal sexual conduct, and felony firearm. However, at sentencing, the circuit
    court imposed a sentence at the high end of the sentencing guidelines range.
    Because of the unique facts of this case, we REMAND this case to the Wayne
    Circuit Court for further proceedings consistent with MCR 6.310(C).
    We do not retain jurisdiction.
    MARILYN KELLY, J. (concurring in result).
    I concur in the result of the Court’s order. I would explicitly vacate defendant’s
    sentence and direct the trial court to sentence defendant at the low end of the guidelines
    range pursuant to its “promise” or provide defendant the opportunity to withdraw his
    plea.
    I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the
    foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
    May 13, 2011                        _________________________________________
    d0510                                                               Clerk
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 141745

Filed Date: 5/13/2011

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/31/2014