Wnc Housing Lp v. Shelborne Development Company LLC ( 2017 )


Menu:
  • Order                                                                                        Michigan Supreme Court
    Lansing, Michigan
    January 24, 2017                                                                                     Stephen J. Markman,
    Chief Justice
    Robert P. Young, Jr.
    Brian K. Zahra
    153770                                                                                            Bridget M. McCormack
    David F. Viviano
    Richard H. Bernstein
    Joan L. Larsen,
    WNC HOUSING LP, SHELTER RESOURCES                                                                                   Justices
    CORPORATION, and WNC INSTITUTIONAL
    TAX CREDIT FUND XVII LP,
    Plaintiffs-Appellees,
    v                                                                 SC: 153770
    COA: 324249
    Wayne CC: 12-003812-CH
    SHELBORNE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LLC,
    KARLEY SQUARE GP LLC, SHELBORNE PARK
    GP LLC, and KATHY S. MAKINO, a/k/a
    KATHY S. MAKINO-LEIPSITZ,
    Defendants-Appellants.
    ___________________________________________/
    On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 23, 2016
    judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in
    lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE that part of the Court of Appeals opinion
    holding that defendant Kathy Makino is personally liable as the guarantor of the
    mortgage purchase, and we REMAND this case to that court for reconsideration. The
    Court of Appeals erred by relying on the testimony of David Shaffer, the executive vice
    president of WNC Associates, Inc., a managing partner of plaintiff WNC Housing LP, in
    interpreting the provisions of the partnership agreement, and by reviewing the trial
    court’s interpretation of the partnership agreement for clear error. See e.g., Detroit Fire
    Fighters Ass’n, IAFF Local 344 v City of Detroit, 
    482 Mich. 18
    , 28 (2008) (“issues of
    contract interpretation are also questions of law reviewed de novo”). On remand, the
    Court of Appeals shall review this issue de novo as a matter of law.
    I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the
    foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
    January 24, 2017
    a0117
    Clerk
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 153770

Filed Date: 1/24/2017

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 1/26/2017