People of Michigan v. Spencer Joseph Paquette ( 2015 )


Menu:
  • Order                                                                                        Michigan Supreme Court
    Lansing, Michigan
    October 28, 2015                                                                                     Robert P. Young, Jr.,
    Chief Justice
    148258                                                                                               Stephen J. Markman
    Brian K. Zahra
    Bridget M. McCormack
    David F. Viviano
    Richard H. Bernstein
    PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,                                                                          Joan L. Larsen,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,                                                                                       Justices
    v                                                                 SC: 148258
    COA: 315907
    Leelanau CC: 12-001780-FH
    SPENCER JOSEPH PAQUETTE,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    _________________________________________/
    By order of July 29, 2014, the application for leave to appeal the October 17, 2013
    order of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in People v
    Lockridge (Docket No. 149073). On order of the Court, the case having been decided on
    July 29, 2015, 
    498 Mich. 358
    (2015), the application is again considered. Pursuant to
    MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the
    Leelanau Circuit Court to determine whether the court would have imposed a materially
    different sentence under the sentencing procedure described in Lockridge. On remand,
    the trial court shall follow the procedure described in Part VI of our opinion. If the trial
    court determines that it would have imposed the same sentence absent the
    unconstitutional constraint on its discretion, it may reaffirm the original sentence. If,
    however, the trial court determines that it would not have imposed the same sentence
    absent the unconstitutional constraint on its discretion, it shall resentence the defendant.
    In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the
    remaining question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
    We do not retain jurisdiction.
    I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the
    foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
    October 28, 2015
    s1019
    Clerk
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 148258

Filed Date: 10/28/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2015